press release
Published: 01 May 2025

Commentary: US-Ukraine mineral deal won’t secure peace or prosperity

The following expert comment below was written by Dr Eric Golson, Associate Professor of Economics at the Âé¶¹ÊÓÆµ, about the geopolitical and economic implications of the proposed US-Ukraine rare earth mineral deal.  

Dr Eric Golson
Dr Eric Golson

“History tells us the US-Ukraine natural resource deal likely will not improve Ukraine’s long-term economic or security position. Economic investment for resource extraction is not a security guarantee, even if traded for weapons; as a matter of fact, these commitments could just as well be honoured by whoever controls Ukrainian territory. Additionally, the US is not concretely obligated to deliver weapons in return. Looking at this strictly economically, a similar agreement with the EU has not materially increased Ukrainian GDP. 

"Ultimately, this is an agreement of geopolitical convenience which reflects American weakness: the US needs Ukrainian minerals to counteract the Chinese blockade; in exchange Ukraine is desperate for a continued flow of weapons. But Ukraine is not as cheap a producer of these rare earths as China, so once Trump’s tariff policies are negotiated away as he promised, the need for Ukrainian minerals will diminish. Ukraine will once again find itself fighting for support."

Related sustainable development goals

Decent Work and Economic Growth UN Sustainable Development Goal 8 logo
Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions UN Sustainable Development Goal 16 logo

Share what you've read?

    Media Contacts


    Georgie Gould
    Media Officer (Faculty of Arts, Business and Social Sciences)
    Phone:

    External Communications and PR team
    Phone: +44 (0)1483 684380 / 688914 / 684378
    Email: mediarelations@surrey.ac.uk
    Out of hours: +44 (0)7773 479911